Gammape was established in 2007 in Vietnam. Our headquarters is located at 11th Road, Dong Xuyen Industrial Zone, Vung Tau City, Vietnam. DKE is a leading consulting, designing, and manufacturing company for processing equipment in Vietnam.

At the core of our business philosophy is sustainable development. We continuously invest in both our workforce and our facilities to meet evolving challenges and exceed client expectations. With over two decades of experience, we have reinforced our position in delivering top-tier products and services, including Pressure Vessels, Process-Engineered Skids and Modules, High-Quality Industrial Equipment, and Steel Structures. Our expertise extends across a range of materials, including Carbon Steel, Austenitic Stainless Steel, Duplex and Super Duplex Stainless Steel, Nickel Alloy, Aluminum Alloy, and Copper Alloy-all certified by leading standards like DNV, LRQA, and ABS.

Every AlphaECC employee is driven by a shared dedication to achieving client satisfaction and collective success. Our full in-house manufacturing and fabrication capabilities, paired with our rigorous internal quality control systems, empower us to deliver unparalleled efficiency and value to our clients and end-users.

default
Renewable energy comes from naturally replenishing resources like sunlight, wind, water, and biomass. It’s a cornerstone for reducing carbon emissions and combating climate change, with global capacity growing rapidly—solar and wind alone accounted for 12% of electricity generation in 2023, up from just 5% a decade ago. Key types include:
  • Solar: Photovoltaic panels or concentrated solar power. Costs dropped 80% since 2010, making it the cheapest new electricity source in many regions.
  • Wind: Onshore and offshore turbines. Offshore wind is scaling fast, with projects like the 3.6 GW Dogger Bank in the UK setting benchmarks.
  • Hydropower: Still the largest renewable source globally, though growth is slowing due to environmental concerns and limited new sites.
  • Geothermal: Tapping Earth’s heat, viable in places like Iceland or the Philippines, but geographically limited.
  • Biomass: Burning organic material or converting it to fuels. Can be carbon-neutral if managed sustainably, but land use and emissions are debated.
Pros: Low operational emissions, energy security, and declining costs. Cons: Intermittency (solar/wind), high upfront costs, and land/water use conflicts. Energy storage (batteries, pumped hydro) and grid upgrades are critical for scaling.
Recent trends show China leading in installations, adding 300 GW of renewables in 2024 alone. The EU and US are pushing hard too, with policies like the Inflation Reduction Act boosting investment. Still, fossil fuels dominate—about 60% of global electricity—so the transition needs to accelerate.
If you want specifics—like tech breakthroughs, policy impacts, or regional stats—let me know what you’re curious about.
Renewable energy plays a growing role in power generation, but it’s part of a broader mix that includes fossil fuels, nuclear, and other sources. Here’s a breakdown of how renewables and other methods contribute to global electricity production, based on the latest trends and data:
  • Global Snapshot: In 2023, global electricity generation was about 29,000 TWh. Renewables (including hydro) made up roughly 30%, fossil fuels 60%, and nuclear ~10%. Renewables are gaining share, with solar and wind growing fastest.
  • Renewables in Power Generation:
    • Hydropower: Largest renewable source at ~15% of global electricity (4,300 TWh in 2023). China, Brazil, and Canada lead. Growth is slow due to environmental impacts and limited new sites.
    • Wind: About 7% of global power (2,100 TWh). China, the US, and Germany are top producers. Offshore wind is expanding, with projects like the UK’s 3.6 GW Dogger Bank.
    • Solar: Around 5% (1,400 TWh). Costs fell 80% since 2010, driving explosive growth—China added 216 GW of solar in 2024 alone. Rooftop and utility-scale both booming.
    • Biomass: ~2% of generation. Used in Europe and parts of Asia, but faces scrutiny over land use and emissions.
    • Geothermal: Under 1%. Significant in Iceland, New Zealand, and parts of the US, but limited by geography.
  • Fossil Fuels:
    • Coal: Still dominant at ~35% (10,000 TWh). China and India rely heavily, though coal’s share is declining in the West.
    • Natural Gas: ~23% (6,700 TWh). Cleaner than coal, it’s a key “bridge” fuel, especially in the US and Middle East.
    • Oil: Less than 3%. Mostly used in remote or island grids, declining due to cost and emissions.
  • Nuclear: Stable at ~10% (2,800 TWh). France, China, and the US lead. New reactors (e.g., small modular reactors) are gaining interest, but high costs and long build times limit growth.
  • Key Trends:
    • Renewables grew 13% year-on-year in 2024, driven by solar and wind. The IEA projects they’ll overtake coal by 2027.
    • Grid-scale battery storage is scaling to handle renewable intermittency—global capacity hit 45 GW in 2024.
    • Coal and gas are declining in Europe and the US but growing in Asia, slowing the global shift.
    • Policies like the EU’s Fit for 55 and US Inflation Reduction Act are pouring billions into clean energy.
  • Challenges:
    • Intermittency: Solar and wind need backup (batteries, gas peakers) or demand-response systems.
    • Grid Infrastructure: Aging grids struggle with distributed renewable inputs. Upgrades cost trillions.
    • Land Use: Large solar/wind farms can disrupt ecosystems. Offshore wind mitigates this but raises costs.
    • Supply Chains: Rare earth metals for turbines and batteries face bottlenecks; China controls much of the market.
If you’re digging into something specific—like comparing costs, forecasting growth, or tech like floating solar—give me a nudge, and I’ll zoom in.
Renewable energy in maritime power generation is an emerging field, driven by the need to decarbonize shipping and port operations, which account for about 3% of global CO2 emissions. The maritime sector traditionally relies on fossil fuels—mainly heavy fuel oil and marine diesel—but renewables are gaining traction through innovative technologies and regulatory pressure. Here’s how renewables are shaping maritime power generation:
  • Key Renewable Applications:
    • Wind-Assisted Propulsion:
      • Modern sails, rotor sails (Flettner rotors), and kites reduce fuel use on cargo ships by harnessing wind. For example, Norsepower’s rotor sails can cut fuel consumption by 5-20% on certain routes.
      • Not full power generation but supplements engines, lowering emissions.
    • Solar Power:
      • Solar panels on ship decks generate electricity for auxiliary systems (lighting, navigation). Icon of the Seas, a cruise ship, uses solar for up to 10% of its auxiliary load.
      • Limited by deck space and intermittent output, so it’s not a primary power source.
    • Shore Power (Cold Ironing):
      • Ports provide grid electricity—often renewable—to docked ships, allowing them to shut off diesel engines. Ports like Rotterdam and Los Angeles have expanded this, with 30% of major ports offering shore power by 2024.
      • Relies on the port’s grid being renewable (e.g., hydro in Norway or wind in Denmark).
    • Wave and Tidal Energy:
      • Experimental wave energy converters could power small vessels or offshore platforms. Tidal systems are less developed for maritime but show promise in coastal areas.
      • Still niche, with high costs and scalability challenges.
    • Biofuels and Green Fuels:
      • Bio-methanol, bio-LNG, and green hydrogen (produced via renewable electricity) are being tested as drop-in fuels for ship engines. Maersk aims for 25% of its fleet to run on green fuels by 2030.
      • Requires renewable energy for production, tying maritime to broader clean energy systems.
  • Emerging Technologies:
    • Hydrogen Fuel Cells: Generate electricity for propulsion via electrochemical reactions. Projects like Norway’s Viking Energy supply ship aim for zero-emission operation by 2026 using green hydrogen.
    • Battery-Powered Ships: Fully electric ferries (e.g., Norway’s Ellen) use lithium-ion batteries charged by renewable grids (often hydro). Limited to short routes due to battery size and weight.
    • Hybrid Systems: Combine batteries, renewables, and fuels. Iconic ships like Hurtigruten’s hybrid cruise liners use batteries and wind-assisted tech for coastal routes.
  • Regulatory Push:
    • The International Maritime Organization (IMO) targets a 50% emissions cut by 2050 (from 2008 levels). Rules like the 2023 Carbon Intensity Indicator (CII) force ships to improve efficiency.
    • EU’s Fit for 55 includes maritime in emissions trading, incentivizing renewables.
    • Ports are under pressure to offer green shore power—California mandates 80% of docked ships use it by 2030.
  • Challenges:
    • Scalability: Renewables can’t yet power large cargo ships across oceans—fossil fuels or green hydrogen are still needed.
    • Infrastructure: Green fuel bunkering and shore power require massive port upgrades. Only 5% of global ports have hydrogen refueling as of 2024.
    • Cost: Retrofitting ships for renewables or green fuels can cost $10-50 million per vessel. Newbuilds are pricier.
    • Energy Density: Batteries and hydrogen have lower energy density than diesel, limiting range for deep-sea shipping.
  • Trends:
    • China leads in electric shipbuilding, with 200+ battery-powered vessels in 2024, mostly inland.
    • Scandinavia dominates green maritime tech—Denmark’s wind expertise and Norway’s hydro support innovation.
    • Green corridors (e.g., Singapore-Rotterdam) are testing zero-carbon routes with renewable-powered ships.
    • Investment is surging—$5 billion went into maritime decarbonization in 2024, per BloombergNEF.
If you want to dive deeper—say, into specific projects, cost breakdowns, or how renewables stack up against green ammonia for ships—just let me know.
Steel mills are heavy industrial facilities that produce steel from raw materials like iron ore, coal, and scrap metal, often using processes like blast furnaces or electric arc furnaces (EAF). They’re energy-intensive, consuming massive amounts of electricity, heat, and fuel, which historically came from fossil fuels. Integrating renewable energy into steel mills, especially in the context of maritime applications (like powering mills near ports or supporting maritime supply chains), is a growing focus to reduce their carbon footprint—steel production accounts for 7-10% of global CO2 emissions. Here’s how renewables tie into steel mills with a maritime angle:
  • Renewable Energy in Steel Mills:
    • Solar: Mills are adopting solar to power operations. For example, a Colorado mill runs almost entirely on a 300 MW solar farm, cutting emissions while producing steel for rail and other uses. Solar is ideal for mills near ports with ample land for panels.
    • Wind: Onshore and offshore wind can supply mills, especially in coastal regions. Europe’s green steel projects often tap wind for electricity and hydrogen production. Offshore wind near ports could power mills handling maritime steel shipments.
    • Green Hydrogen: A game-changer for steel. Instead of coal in blast furnaces, hydrogen (produced via renewable-powered electrolysis) reduces iron ore in direct reduced iron (DRI) processes. Projects like Sweden’s Hybrit and H2 Green Steel use renewables to make hydrogen, aiming for near-zero emissions. Ports are key for importing/exporting green hydrogen or DRI pellets.
    • Hydropower: Mills in regions like Norway use hydro to power EAFs or hydrogen production. Coastal mills could leverage hydro-rich grids for maritime steel supply chains.
    • Biomass/Waste Heat: Some mills use biomass or capture waste heat for power, though less common. Ports could integrate biomass from shipping waste for mill energy.
  • Maritime Connection:
    • Port Proximity: Many steel mills are near ports for raw material imports (iron ore, coal) and steel exports. Renewables like offshore wind or shore power can decarbonize both mill and port operations. For instance, Rotterdam’s port aims for green hydrogen hubs to supply nearby mills.
    • Green Steel for Maritime: Steel from renewable-powered mills is used in shipbuilding (hulls, propellers) and maritime infrastructure (cranes, docks). Demand for low-carbon steel is rising as shipping decarbonizes.
    • Hydrogen Supply Chains: Ports are becoming hubs for green hydrogen, critical for DRI steelmaking. Mills near ports can access imported hydrogen or renewable-powered electrolyzers, linking maritime logistics to steel production.
    • Electrified Transport: Mills use renewables to power electric cranes, conveyors, and trucks for moving steel to ships, cutting emissions in port-based supply chains.
  • Challenges:
    • Energy Demand: Steel mills need consistent, high-volume power—renewables like solar/wind are intermittent, requiring batteries or backup (often gas).
    • Infrastructure: Retrofitting mills for hydrogen or renewable grids is costly ($1-2 billion for DRI conversion). Ports need upgrades for hydrogen bunkering or shore power.
    • Scalability: Green hydrogen supply is limited—global production was only 0.1% of demand in 2024. Maritime transport of hydrogen adds cost and complexity.
    • Economics: Renewable-powered steel is pricier than coal-based, though carbon taxes and demand for green steel (e.g., for ships) are closing the gap.
  • Trends:
    • China, the largest steel producer, is testing hydrogen-based mills near coastal hubs, leveraging solar/wind.
    • Europe leads in green steel—H2 Green Steel’s Baltic port-adjacent mill aims for 5 million tons by 2030, using wind/hydro.
    • US mills, like Nucor’s, are signing renewable power deals (solar, wind) to supply EAFs, with ports handling scrap imports.
    • Maritime policies (IMO’s 2050 goals) push demand for green steel, encouraging mills to adopt renewables faster.
If you’re looking for specifics—like a mill’s renewable setup, hydrogen’s maritime logistics, or steel for shipbuilding—tell me what’s on your mind, and I’ll drill down.